does pale moon browser have an incogno setting

#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING HOW TO#
#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING UPDATE#
#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING DOWNLOAD#

Here are some more cool about:config tips. By default this option is switched off, because of its large performance impact on routines reading this data. By setting the about:config preference canvas.poisondata to true, any data read back from canvas surfaces will be “poisoned” with humanly imperceptible data changes.

Pale Moon includes an option to make canvas fingerprinting much more difficult.

The setting in milliseconds is perhaps the most important here, because Firefox is eating your SSD.

Take the vow of being careful and enter below key values in the search field. (See below.)Įntering about:config in the address bar will bring up an interface for viewing and setting a wide variety of configuration variables, many of which are not otherwise accessible through the GUI. As a matter of fact, about:config might be considered the preferred route, as more configuration variables need to be set to ensure privacy. However, Do Not Track can also be set from the about:config URI.

#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING HOW TO#

Here is how to set Do Not Track from the menu: Edit > Preferences > Privacy > Tracking.

Firefox add-ons with compatibility issues on Pale Moon.

A lot of changes were introduced to the user interface since Firefox versions 29 & 34 not all for the better.

The add-ons are what makes this browser so great.

precursors of new web technology RSS, javascript, add-ons, chrome, automatic updates, tabs.

Stroobandt Copyright 2014–2019, licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Since it's basically FF at heart, most extensions apparently work just fine on it, so it seems like it should be a fairly-seamless transition.Essential Pale Moon & Firefox Browser Add‑ons Serge Y. However, I just stumbled across something that might solve my problem: Pale Moon, an independently-developed browser based on the FF source that aims for increased efficiency and (most importantly for me) rejects the Mozilla team's more recent UI philosophies. I've used Firefox for long enough that the idea of completely jumping ship is really unappealing: Chrome is right out, because it's the exact unappealing direction that Mozilla is currently heading, and beyond that there are who knows how many obscure options. (Case in point: I was using a lovely little theme that adapted the colorful old FF3 buttons for more modern versions, but the developer eventually gave up on it because of how disgusted he was getting with Mozilla's policy directions.) There's already someone who's whipped up yet another extension for the beta release to revert things back, but it's come to the point where I feel like I'm having to rely on the whims of various third-party developers just to maintain a sane browsing experience, and there are no guarantees that said add-ons will be maintained into the foreseeable future.

Looking ahead a bit, it seems as though the straw that will break my back will be the release of the completely-redesigned 'Australis' theme at some point next year, when even the ability to keep my tabs right above the page view will be removed for good. Now that older option has been removed entirely, and the only way I'm able to keep using it is via an extension some kind developer whipped up.

#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING UPDATE#

The most recent casualty with the update to FF26 was the complete removal of the old separate downloads window: Mozilla had removed the options dialog for this in favor of pushing their new (overly-convoluted) integrated downloads display, but they at least left the old system in place if you tweaked an about:config option, which I had.

#DOES PALE MOON BROWSER HAVE AN INCOGNO SETTING DOWNLOAD#

There have been a few different occasions when I've been forced to download an extension just to keep the browser working as it did previously. The main takeaway from this is that there have been any number of features I consider integral to my daily browsing experience that have been moved from the standard options menu to toggles buried somewhere in about:config, or else just removed from FF entirely. In the past year or so, since the move to the rapid-release schedule, the idea seems to be to turn FF into as much of a Chrome clone as possible in both appearance and functionality (ignoring the fact that if people wanted something that looks and feels like Chrome, they'd just go download ****ing Chrome instead). It started around the time of FF4, with various button merges and the default to 'tabs on top' appearance (complete with a laughable video detailing why it was 'the better way to browse'). Over the years, though, I've become more and more disillusioned with the direction the Mozilla team is taking the project, particularly in terms of basic functionality and UI.

I've been a loyal Firefox user ever since I first graduated from the Internet diapers phase and realized what a piece of **** IE6 was. The FreeSpace Universe Reference Project.

Does pale moon browser have an incogno setting